Thursday, February 18, 2010

Unintended Consequences of Funding Mujahideen 1979-1989

On Wednesday, February 10, 2010, former Texas congressman Charlie Wilson passed away of cardiopulmonary arrest at age 76(Yahoo). Wilson is famous for essentially forcing the United States Congress (through the Central Intelligence Agency) to fund the Afghan war against the Soviets during the 1980’s. Last year I read Charlie Wilson’s War, and it was incredible to read about what Charlie accomplished, and to see what an entertainingly rich character he was. However, it soon became obvious that the government’s obsession with killing Soviets during that decade caused narrow minded policymaking that would ultimately rear its ugly head in the smoldering wreckage of the Twin Towers twenty years later.

While reading, I became disappointed with how Wilson, the intelligence community, and other Washington leaders did not think of the long-term consequences of funding radical Islamist warlords in a region embroiled in civic chaos. No doubt, Wilson and all of America fought the Cold War and its proxy conflicts (Afghanistan, Vietnam, Korea) with nothing but good, honest intentions. They had seen great atrocities at Afghan refugee camps, had witnessed children maimed by Soviet “toy” bombs, and simply wanted to make America and the world a safer place by curbing communism. The secret funding of the Afghan war, however, has come down through history as a shining example of unintended consequences.

The mental model behind the policy was that the Soviet presence in Afghanistan was a threat to U.S. national security (by means of the general spread of communism). The mountainous Afghan landscape and their “home turf” advantage made a successful insurgency by the Afghan war bands a legitimate possibility. They simply didn’t have the correct mix of modern weaponry to get the job done. Most importantly, they didn’t have the American shoulder-fired Stinger missile to neutralize the air superiority of the Soviet Hind attack helicopter. So, American policymakers gave the war bands money, weapons, and ammunition in abundance (famously buying up almost all of the world’s Tennessee mules to carry guns into the rugged terrain) and the tide shifted in favor of the Mujahideen (or “holy warriors”). In 1989, the last Soviet tanks crossed back out of Afghanistan, and the Berlin Wall collapsed soon after, the war having accelerated an already cracking Soviet Union. This withdrawal from Afghanistan was then thought to have contributed to a safer America.

The unintended consequence of this policy was that once there were no Soviet troops to fight, the temporarily-aligned war bands of Afghanistan turned on each other ferociously, sparking civil war and creating a lawless country in which terrorists such as Osama bin Laden (kicked out of Saudi Arabia and Sudan) could find fertile ground. Not to mention that many of the now infamous terrorist such as bin Laden got their fame fighting the Soviets. This feedback was delayed, and policymakers did not have a broad enough conception of the system to fully anticipate it.

The technical feedback loops can be viewed below in this simplified causal loop diagram of the situation:

Sources:

1. Yahoo News. "Former Texas Rep. Charlie Wilson dies at 76". http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100210/ap_on_re_us/us_obit_wilson

Sunday, February 7, 2010

NFL Concussions

There has been a lot of buzz this year among sports news networks about the problem of concussions among current and former NFL players. NFL commissioner Goodell introduced a rule change in December of this year stipulating that players who are hit and exhibit concussion-like symptoms must not return to practice or a game for the rest of the day (1). Former NFL players have been very vocal this year about protecting the long-term health of league alumni (2). Current players are claiming that official statistics do not reflect the dozens of concussions players hide from in order to be able to continue play (3).

Concussions have certainly been a chronic issue in professional football for decades, but this year it seems that every broadcaster and sports anchor has been talking about it more than ever. Congress even called NFL administrators to the capital this winter in order to confront them on their ignoring of former players' health problems (4). Whether there truly have been a statistically significant number of concussions in the past few seasons, or whether the hype is simply due to greater media attention, the fact remains that concussions are a serious and chronic problem to be examined critically.

The problem of concussions in the NFL can be described as a problem that has evolved over time, and part of a broader system including many interdependent factors. “Hard”, measurable, elements of the system include the number of “missile style” tackles, the current concussion rate in the league, the number of players that play injured, equipment improvements and the size and speed of current football athletes. What is meant by “missile style” tackle is a type of tackle where one player essentially launches himself into another in order to bring him to the ground or force the ball out of his hands. Some analysts believe that the “missile” tackle is becoming more common, as players are bigger and stronger and therefore more difficult to tackle using the traditional “wrestling style” tackle (5). The league may be considering rule changes in order to encourage the safer “wrestling” tackle. Two “soft”, not easily measured, elements include the pressure on players to keep their jobs with their teams, and the overarching social pressure in football to be “tough” and “macho” (as playing injured is highly respected).

One simple but important reinforcing feedback loop includes the number of “missile” style tackles, concussion rate, equipment improvement, and the size and physicality of players. As players become larger, stronger, and faster, the frequency of “missile” style tackles increases. As more players employ this more dangerous form of tackles, concussion rates increase. As concussion rates increase, the league will be forced either through its own administrative decision making or through public pressure to, among other actions such as rule changes, improve equipment. Better equipment then makes players braver and more physical, knowing that their advanced gear will (theoretically) shield them from serious injury. As players strive to then become even stronger and faster, the reinforcing cycle begins again.

Both the reinforcing feedback loop and the complete connection circle can be viewed below.